[APG Public List] [APG Members] place names

Janice Sellers janicemsj at gmail.com
Wed Oct 27 09:44:58 MDT 2010

I think "boundary definitions + effective time period" is an important
component of the GPS concept being discussed.  Many, possibly most,
places do not have the same boundaries over time.  As an example,
small communities are often annexed by large ones.  So, for instance,
I live in Oakland, California.  If I were to include a general
boundary GPS listing for Oakland as it is now, it would be much larger
than Oakland was in the mid-1870's, when the section of the city in
which I live was annexed.

Janice M. Sellers

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 7:17 AM,  <linda at fpr.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I see how use of GPS coordinates has much impact on the
> discussion of current vs historical place names.   GPS descriptors are
> an additional place qualification, and IMO they are very useful.   Names
> and their associated boundary definitions + effective time period and
> the correspondence between then and now... all that is still important
> as they have been.

More information about the APGPublicList mailing list