[APG Public List] [TGF] [APG Members] Source Citation study groupcommencinc soon

Elissa Scalise Powell, CG Elissa at PowellGenealogy.com
Thu Jun 10 17:43:33 MDT 2010

I agree that it could work. We just finished the Standards Manual. Perhaps it is time to move onto systematic EE discussions on TGF. 

Or another approach is to take the ProGen model and use EE instead of ProGen. The model has a proven track record and is described in an article by Angela McGhie in an APG Quarterly. The model includes smaller groups for manageable discussions but with an experienced mentor. The mentor does not lead the group but only advises and acts as a resource. It works well and lets peers step up and practice leadership skills. Of course those peer leaders have to be found -- and the more the merrier. No kings or queens here! <g>

It will be interesting to see how this resolves.

-- Elissa in Pittsburgh this week and Birmingham next week

Elissa Scalise Powell, CG
CG and Certified Genealogist are Service Marks of the Board for Certification of Genealogists, used under license by board certificants after periodic evaluations by the Board. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Michele Kemper
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 7:33 PM
> I think a step by step discussion of EE would be a good fit for TGF or the open APG list.
> That would allow everyone to discuss the topics openly and get expert input into the
> subject matter. Since EE examines a wide range of records, it could be more than looking
> at source citation, but looking at the breadth and depth of records available.
> Any thoughts?

More information about the APGPublicList mailing list