<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18975">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Again, they're used in conjunction with the place names and the usual
accompanying explanations. They just don't sit there on their own!
Added on as a way to allow us to employ other means of locating and
understanding a named location, but used alongside other more traditional naming
approaches. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I think there's a real misunderstanding of how coordinates could be
employed. They aren't some sort of be-all and end-all, not the only
identifier used for a place in a genealogical record. They simply
translate the named location into at least an approximate location and they
would allow various name changes to be catalogued under the same
coordinates.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Used intelligently they offer a wide range of possibilities that names
alone cannot match</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Larry</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=terry@reigelridge.com href="mailto:terry@reigelridge.com">Terry
Reigel</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=apgpubliclist@apgen.org
href="mailto:apgpubliclist@apgen.org">apgpubliclist</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, October 27, 2010 11:44
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [APG Public List] place
names</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Stephen Danko wrote:<BR>> GPS coordinates can be specified
so that they represent<BR>> either a large general area or a spot the size
of a<BR>> pinpoint. It's all in how many significant figures
one<BR>> lists in the coordinates.<BR><BR>Your point makes perfect logical
sense, Stephen. But to me the issue is how to get those reading those
coordinates to understand the difference between high and low precision
figures? If a reader plugs the coordinates into an a mapping service or
application, as far as I know, there is no difference in result between high
and low precision data. A very precise spot is identified, even though the
actual coordinates may be very un-precise.<BR><BR>So if one uses coordinates
to define a general area it falls upon the writer to communicate to the reader
that the coordinates are approximate, or represent the center or an area,
etc., as the case may be. It seems to me that to rely on including fewer
significant digits alone risks misleading the reader.<BR><BR>Stephen wrote in
a later message:<BR><BR>> ... So, how do we cite sources for these
coordinates? <BR>> Should the precision of the measurement be specified
in<BR>> the source, in the coordinate itself, or in a note?
The<BR>> fields for coordinates in Family Tree Maker 2011 include<BR>>
no provision for recording precision and, as far as I can<BR>> tell,
include no provision for recording a source<BR>> citation or a note for the
coordinates.<BR><BR>I'm not familiar with other programs, but in TMG the
coordinates field is just one of several place fields, all of which can be
cited along with the other fields. So a user can include a citation to the
source of the coordinates, and mention in the Citation Detail any note about
the precision of the measurement, and/or in the case of larger areas, how the
coordinates relate to the area being described.<BR><BR>One may be able include
some indication (other then fewer significant digits) in the data field, if
the program doesn't preclude that by editing the values entered. But doing so
is likely to disable automatic plotting features that may be depending on that
data. For example, TMG will let you include any text you like in the
coordinates field (after warning you that the data is not in an expected
format) but doing so will likely cause both TMG's own mapping feature and that
of the companion website-building program Second Site to fail.<BR><BR>Terry
Reigel</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>