<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18928"></HEAD>
<BODY
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; PADDING-RIGHT: 10px; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; PADDING-TOP: 15px"
id=MailContainerBody bottomMargin=7 leftMargin=0 rightMargin=7 topMargin=0
CanvasTabStop="true" name="Compose message area">
<DIV>Regarding giving one dollar in a will:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I have seen a will that allotted one dollar (or ten shillings or
some such) to "any child who comes forth claiming to be an heir." The
will's maker named his legal children; I supposed he was "covering his
bases" in case the child of another woman made a claim. I don't know
if legally that would do, but at least he was expressing his "will" in the
matter.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I love wills, as they often reveal mercurial family dynamics. One man
willed an equal share to all his sons. The amount to one son, however, was
to be put in trust administered by another son, who was instructed to give
the son allowances "should he ever give up gaming and intemperance."</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>A recent project revealed a will of a wealthy fellow with five
sons, three obviously being favored, as they were mentioned in glowing terms
multiple times and received an equal share of the man's legacy of land,
town lots, and money. The fourth was mentioned as having already
received the share due him (which was only a town lot). The
interesting part was the fifth son. He had apparently taken a loan
from his father for his present dwelling place, but had not repaid it. The
father did not forgive the loan (as one would imagine), but rather set the
interest retroactively to the time the loan was first made, and gave the
son two years to pay it off, lest the land return to the estate, to be divided
among the three favored brothers.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>And, of course, there is the profligate son-in-law . . . One will
specifically gives a daughter the portion equal to that of the other
daughters, to be held by this daughter in trust for the "heirs of her
body." He specifically named his son-in-law, no doubt a
rapscallion of some stripe, and said this man had already
squandered enough of his money and did not deserve another
shilling.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I also love estate inventories. My 3rd great
grandfather's estate inventory included a Gunter's scale, which was an
early forerunner to the slide rule. He came to America as a child, an
indentured servant. No doubt poor and uneducated, he worked in
his profession of millwright and mechanic to a reputation of some skill.
He built Thomas Jefferson's first threshing machine from a model Jefferson had
ordered from the inventor in Scotland (delivered to Jefferson through Thomas
Pinckney), and then improved on it and built at least one other. He was
not wealthy, to judge from his estate inventory, but rather a man of a
respectable working class with modest land ownership. A
Baptist, he also contributed his little bit to the efforts for
religious freedom in early Virginia, which he could not have done in his English
homeland. I say all this to point out that this is the story
of so many who came to the Colonies and found opportunities out of reach to
them at home. They set the American pattern we cherish in the
stories of our families.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>But I digress, as usual.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Warmest Regards,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Donna </DIV></BODY></HTML>