<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18928">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>
<DIV>Excellent ideas, and they all serve the same ultimate goals. You'd
think this was a competitive race though. I think I've kicked open a very
pent up desire to learn here.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Remember though that I have nothing to gain and much to lose since
this has become such a public issue on these lists today, but my intentions are
honest and my motives are to try to make a small contribution
to improving discussions on this subject. The more places people
have to turn to deepen their understanding of source citations (or any
other genealogical matter), the better. Obviously the demand is there for
more information, more opportunities to expand knowledge on this subject.
But that's the way genealogists are built. There's always a greater hunger
for new opportunities to learn than there are venues available, so I'm very
pleased to see this sudden creative response to a long neglected need.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I hope some of the people who have joined the yahoo study group
also take part in these ventures, and bring the ideas and knowledge back to our
little effort in turn. And maybe the reverse will happen too.
</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Larry</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Larry Boswell BA, PLCGS<BR><A
href="http://www.TheBackstairs.com">www.TheBackstairs.com</A><BR><A
href="http://thebackstairs.com/blog/">http://thebackstairs.com/blog/</A><BR>"Experts
in Historical & Genealogical Research"<BR>Listowner, TheoryGen (a
non-archived list)<BR><A
href="http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/theorygen/">http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/theorygen/</A><BR>Ottawa,
Ontario, Canada<BR><A
href="mailto:laboswell@rogers.com">laboswell@rogers.com</A></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=Elissa@PowellGenealogy.com
href="mailto:Elissa@PowellGenealogy.com">Elissa Scalise Powell, CG</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=misha412@yahoo.com
href="mailto:misha412@yahoo.com">'Michele Kemper'</A> ; <A
title=APGMembersOnlyList@apgen.org
href="mailto:APGMembersOnlyList@apgen.org">APGMembersOnlyList@apgen.org</A> ;
<A title=APGPublicList@apgen.org
href="mailto:APGPublicList@apgen.org">APGPublicList@apgen.org</A> ; <A
title=transitional-genealogists-forum@rootsweb.com
href="mailto:transitional-genealogists-forum@rootsweb.com">transitional-genealogists-forum@rootsweb.com</A>
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, June 10, 2010 7:43
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [APG Public List] [TGF] [APG
Members] Source Citationstudy groupcommencinc soon</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Michele,<BR>I agree that it could work. We just finished the
Standards Manual. Perhaps it is time to move onto systematic EE discussions on
TGF. <BR><BR>Or another approach is to take the ProGen model and use EE
instead of ProGen. The model has a proven track record and is described in an
article by Angela McGhie in an APG Quarterly. The model includes smaller
groups for manageable discussions but with an experienced mentor. The mentor
does not lead the group but only advises and acts as a resource. It works well
and lets peers step up and practice leadership skills. Of course those peer
leaders have to be found -- and the more the merrier. No kings or queens here!
<g><BR><BR>It will be interesting to see how this resolves.<BR><BR>--
Elissa in Pittsburgh this week and Birmingham next week<BR><BR>Elissa Scalise
Powell, CG<BR><A
href="http://www.PowellGenealogy.com">www.PowellGenealogy.com</A><BR>CG and
Certified Genealogist are Service Marks of the Board for Certification of
Genealogists, used under license by board certificants after periodic
evaluations by the Board. <BR><BR><BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>>
From: On Behalf Of Michele Kemper<BR>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 7:33
PM<BR>> <BR>> I think a step by step discussion of EE would be a good
fit for TGF or the open APG list.<BR>> That would allow everyone to discuss
the topics openly and get expert input into the<BR>> subject matter. Since
EE examines a wide range of records, it could be more than looking<BR>> at
source citation, but looking at the breadth and depth of records
available.<BR>> <BR>> Any thoughts?<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>