<div>I have quite a few 3-D slides from the 1950s that my dad took. The clarity is astonishing in a 3-D viewer. I wanted to digitize them to use in a digital photo story DVD and in a photo book, and I couldn't find any place that could digitize the 3-D format. The mounts didn't fit in the slide mounts on a scanner. Fortunately I had his old projector. I purchased a piece of white foam board and mounted it on the wall and projected the slide on that. I set up my camera on a tripod and photographed the image. The results were not bad, definitely usable. I would love to learn of a device that would allow them to be scanned at home or a commercial service that could scan them, though, if anyone has any recommendations. Thank you!</div>
<div><br></div><div>Cathi Desmarais</div><br clear="all">Stone House Historical Research<br>Genealogical and Forensic Research<br>Heirloom Albums and Family Tree Charts<br>From Vermont's beautiful Champlain Valley<br>
<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:41 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:john@johnwylie.com">john@johnwylie.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Larry,<br>
<br>
My testing of a similar solution six years ago failed. Since imaging 35mm<br>
slides involves so much magnification I found that slight imperfections in<br>
the backlight material affected the final digital image in noticeable and<br>
negative ways. I took a 20+ magnifier to two sorters and one passive viewer<br>
and was astonished at how imperfect the media were. The three I tested were<br>
all white translucent plastic and were most likely made for general viewing.<br>
I did not test any glass sorters, so they might return much different<br>
results.<br>
<br>
John Wylie<br>
APG Member<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:apgpubliclist-bounces@apgen.org">apgpubliclist-bounces@apgen.org</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:apgpubliclist-bounces@apgen.org">apgpubliclist-bounces@apgen.org</a>] On Behalf Of LBoswell<br>
Sent: Monday, December 28, 2009 9:10 AM<br>
To: Marieta Grissom; 'Amy Crow'; 'Claire Bettag'<br>
Cc: 'Mail list APG'<br>
Subject: Re: [APG Public List] Digitizing 35mm slides<br>
<br>
Yes, exactly. The trick is to make sure the camera is squared up with the<br>
sorter. Also position the slides so that all are evenly lit. I don't use a<br>
<br>
close up setting on the camera, but you could if you wanted to do a smaller<br>
group (or a single) instead which would give you a higher resolution result<br>
<br>
a slide sorter, or a homemade light box/table, anything with a translucent<br>
surface that can be backlit<br>
<br>
Larry<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: "Marieta Grissom" <<a href="mailto:marieta.grissom@msn.com">marieta.grissom@msn.com</a>><br>
To: "'LBoswell'" <<a href="mailto:laboswell@rogers.com">laboswell@rogers.com</a>>; "'Amy Crow'"<br>
<<a href="mailto:amy@amyjohnsoncrow.com">amy@amyjohnsoncrow.com</a>>; "'Claire Bettag'" <<a href="mailto:claire@clairebettag.com">claire@clairebettag.com</a>><br>
Cc: "'Mail list APG'" <<a href="mailto:apgpubliclist@apgen.org">apgpubliclist@apgen.org</a>><br>
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 6:08 PM<br>
Subject: RE: [APG Public List] Digitizing 35mm slides<br>
<br>
<br>
> Larry,<br>
><br>
> What you are talking about reminds me of a slide sorter? Would that work?<br>
><br>
> Marieta A. Grissom, CG<br>
> 505 West Jackson Avenue<br>
> Indianola, Iowa 50125-1119<br>
><br>
> CG and Certified Genealogist are Service Marks of the Board for<br>
> Certification of Genealogists used under license after periodic<br>
> evaluations<br>
> by the Board.<br>
><br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:apgpubliclist-bounces@apgen.org">apgpubliclist-bounces@apgen.org</a><br>
> [mailto:<a href="mailto:apgpubliclist-bounces@apgen.org">apgpubliclist-bounces@apgen.org</a>] On Behalf Of LBoswell<br>
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 8:50 AM<br>
> To: Amy Crow; Claire Bettag<br>
> Cc: Mail list APG<br>
> Subject: Re: [APG Public List] Digitizing 35mm slides<br>
><br>
> I used a digital camera on a high res setting, and a homemade back lit<br>
> holder (translucent white plastic with a flourescent fixture behind it<br>
> (you<br>
><br>
> need to set the light so that there isn't a strongly lit focus or 'hot<br>
> spot'<br>
><br>
> where some slides are lit differently than others). Use an indoor or<br>
> flourescent setting on the camera. Camera is simply left squared up to<br>
> the<br>
> holder, and on a tripod until I've completed however many slides I need to<br>
> scan. Have done hundreds of slides in no time at all (inherited a<br>
> collection of 3000 slides that needed to be copied). Line the slides up,<br>
> 'click'....next batch.<br>
><br>
> You can buy these back lit displays secondhand from a photo store but it's<br>
> easy to make one up<br>
><br>
> I find about 8-10 slides grouped together works best. Then open the<br>
> result<br>
> in any graphics/photo editor and cut/paste each image out (lowers the<br>
> resolution of each individual image, but still easily high enough to<br>
> display<br>
><br>
> digitally or print out in a standard sized print).<br>
><br>
> Better results than my scanner (which has a slide scanner built in), and<br>
> much faster. But of course not worth setting up if you're just doing a<br>
> handful of slides.<br>
><br>
> Larry<br>
> ----- Original Message -----<br>
> From: "Amy Crow" <<a href="mailto:amy@amyjohnsoncrow.com">amy@amyjohnsoncrow.com</a>><br>
> To: "Claire Bettag" <<a href="mailto:claire@clairebettag.com">claire@clairebettag.com</a>><br>
> Cc: "Mail list APG" <<a href="mailto:apgpubliclist@apgen.org">apgpubliclist@apgen.org</a>><br>
> Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 7:27 AM<br>
> Subject: Re: [APG Public List] Digitizing 35mm slides<br>
><br>
><br>
>>A few years ago, I scanned several hundred slides for my parents' 50th<br>
>>anniversary party. I purchased a slide adaptor for my flatbed scanner.<br>
>>Although the results were very good, I would not recommend doing it that<br>
>>way if you have the volume you are talking about. It was *very* slow and<br>
>>tedious. If I had to do it over again, I would invest in a dedicated<br>
>>slide<br>
><br>
>>scanner.<br>
>><br>
>> Amy<br>
>><br>
>> =========<br>
>> Amy Johnson Crow, CG<br>
>> Reynoldsburg, Ohio<br>
>><br>
>> On Dec 26, 2009, at 8:52 PM, Claire Bettag wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> I have several hundred 35mm slides (snapshots taken mainly in the 1970s<br>
>>> and '80s) that I want to convert to digitized images--just to preserve<br>
>>> the family photos. I'm considering sending the slides off to a service<br>
>>> to have them done rather than purchase a scanner to convert them<br>
>>> myself.<br>
><br>
>>> I'd appreciate any advice, recommendations, pointers from others who<br>
>>> have used such services. Feel free to respond privately.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Many thanks, in advance.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Claire<br>
>>><br>
>>> Claire Bettag<br>
>>> 1685 34th Street NW<br>
>>> Washington, DC 20007<br>
>>> 202-625-2598<br>
>>> cell: 202-436-2121<br>
>>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>