[APG Public List] Need help interpreting 1893 Minnesota marriagelicense

Ray Beere Johnson II raybeere at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 6 20:23:05 MST 2011

The statement "_and parents_ on oath" (emphasis mine) suggests that the parents _were_ involved, at least to the extent of giving their oath to affirm that their son was twenty-one. I have _never_ seen any legal document which stated anyone had given their oath on any matter unless it intended to indicate that they had done just that. So "no involvement by the parents" is a conclusion directly contradicted by the evidence.
                            Ray Beere Johnson II

--- On Sun, 3/6/11, david t. robertson <robertson.d at rcn.com> wrote:

> It appears to me that the groom said he was 21.  Don't read more into 
> the record than is there.  The parents permission was not necessary.  
> The statement might mean that the clerk doubted his age was true or he 
> was just stating the law.  No involvement by the parents is indicated.  


More information about the APGPublicList mailing list