[APG Public List] Publisher for Footnotes

Eileen Souza eileen.souza at verizon.net
Mon Sep 13 09:08:37 MDT 2010

I found Publisher better for image placement than Word but Word is better for 
footnotes.  Also, publisher does better on text in textboxes.   I have done some 
imaging in Publisher and then exported it to Word to finish but that is 

Eileen Souza
Eldersburg, MD 21784
eileen.souza at verizon.net


From: Michael John Neill <mjnrootdig at gmail.com>
To: APG APG Public <apgpubliclist at apgen.org>
Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 9:58:12 AM
Subject: Re: [APG Public List] Publisher for Footnotes

To answer some questions that I received offlist:

I publish a weekly how-to newsletter, complete with citations and illustrations. 
Word serves my purpose for the writing, editing and proofreading process. There 
are times where Word just seems to make the placement and handling of images 
difficult, or at least more difficult than it needs to be. I won't give up the 
citations and illustrations are extremely helpful. Word sometimes just seems to 
slow down my final layout process and sometimes I just don't have time for the 
delay and frustration. 

There are two samples of the typical "output" here:


On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Michael John Neill <mjnrootdig at gmail.com> 

Does anyone have any recommendations and experience with using Publisher for 
footnotes and image placement? I'm needing something a little more sophisticated 
than Word. Thanks.
>Michael John Neill
>Casefile Clues-Genealogy How-Tos

Michael John Neill
Casefile Clues-Genealogy How-Tos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20100913/d7151ce8/attachment.htm>

More information about the APGPublicList mailing list