[APG Public List] place names
DonnDevine at aol.com
DonnDevine at aol.com
Wed Oct 27 00:18:43 MDT 2010
Larry wrrote:
>I'd like to explore options for rationalizing the use of coordinates in
conjunction with the use of place names. Seems to me a few simple
guidelines would allow someone to tell when coordinates were
representative
of the whole township and when they referred to a specific, (almost)
exact
location within the township.
>then it wouldn't matter whether historical names or modern names were
used
as they would all be available by referencing the coordinates they share.
It seems to me this can be easily accomplished by cutting back the decimal
places in the geographic coordinates until they are general enough to
encompass the entire village, town, county or whatever other area is is being
referenced.
Data results should never be reported with more precision than the least
precise input justifies. I vividlyremember an undergraduate college
professor who would shout "You lie!" when an aspiring engineering student proudly
announced a problem solution to four decimal places, derived using
five-place log tables, when one of the input measure had only three significant
figures.
Pi may be 3.14159, but the circumference of a 12.0-inch circle is at best
only 37.7 inches--not the 37.69908 inches a calculator may show.
Donn Devine
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20101027/9fb271b1/attachment.htm>
More information about the APGPublicList
mailing list