[APG Public List] the new vs. the old Family History Library catalog
plhgenealogy at gmail.com
Mon Nov 8 16:50:21 MST 2010
When I search on the old catalog in a particular location in Italy, there
are something along the lines of hundreds of microfilm rolls for civil
registrations. I had trouble when I clicked on "Film Notes" and got an error
message. So I switched over to the beta site, and they didn't come up at all
there even though it's pretty clear how to get to them. I have not
discounted the fact that this may be due to operator error though and so I
didn't want to complain until I knew I did everything I should have.
I actually like the way that you could click on what you wanted to see in
the pilot site better than the way you search in the beta site. I liked
being able to choose two or three things; whereas with the Beta site, you're
narrowing selections to just one record group.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:14 PM, <amy at amyjohnsoncrow.com> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, Helen, what do you find "really annoying" about the beta
> version of the catalog?
> Amy Johnson Crow, CG,
> Reynoldsburg, Ohio
> On Mon, November 8, 2010 5:04 pm, Helen Ullmann wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > If you don't like the new beta Family History Library catalog, please
> > let them know! I think you can send an email to FamilySearch
> > <noreply.familysearch at getsatisfaction.com>.
> > Or I think there's a place on the beta catalog website to send feedback.
> > Or do you love the new catalog? I can't search it effectively at all.
> > It's really annoying. The old catalog was very clear and easy.
> > The more people they hear from, the more seriously they will consider
> > bringing back the old catalog. Right now it's not working, or at least
> > well.
> > Helen Ullmann
> > P.S. I don't think this is a duplicate message, but apologies if it is.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the APGPublicList