[APG Public List] Question on London, England, census, birth place discrepancies. Ignore previous.

Jack Butler jackbutler at shwgenealogy.com
Tue Jan 12 08:09:56 MST 2010


William Loe is in the 1861 Census with his parents - the family is indexed 
as Loes.

Jack Butler
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Gray" <Christopher.Gray at Newscope-Solutions.co.uk>
To: "'APG LIST as of Summer 2009'" <apgpubliclist at apgen.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:08 AM
Subject: RE: [APG Public List] Question on London, England, census,birth 
place discrepancies. Ignore previous.


> I've found the marriage of William LOE to Frances DUNNELL (.via 
> Ancestry) -
> 9th August 1871.
>
> William LOE of full age - a shoe maker resident in Bethnal Green - father
> James LOE deceased
> Frances DUNNELL of full age - resident in Bethnal Green - father Joseph
> DUNNELL - blacksmith
>
> Seems as though the chain is fairly full now - though I'd still like the
> 1861 census entry to tidy it up.
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: apgpubliclist-bounces at apgen.org
> [mailto:apgpubliclist-bounces at apgen.org] On Behalf Of CL Swope (alfonsa)
> Sent: 12 January 2010 03:29
> To: APG LIST as of Summer 2009
> Subject: [APG Public List] Question on London, England, census, birth 
> place
> discrepancies. Ignore previous.
>
> I neglected to put place of birth ofr the 1851 census and have corrected
> and am resending. Please ignore previous post of same name.
>
> Might someone be able to tell me if the data here makes sense as
> possibly the same man. I am working with areas I am unfamiliar with and
> don't know if it makes sense or not.
> I'd like to confirm that it makes sense that the William Loe of the
> 1871, 81 91 and 1901 censuses (shoemaker) could be the William LOW of
> 1841 and 1851 (son of a shoemaker) , and the William LOE born 1940 from
> Free BMD (first entry in list below)
>
> 1840
> William LOE born 1840, Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar ; District:
> Lambeth County: Greater London, London, Surrey (from Ancestry.com's Free
> BMD "England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915" database)
>
> 1841census. Civil parish: Lambeth Hundred: Brixton (Eastern Division)
> County/Island: Surrey; Registration district: Lambeth Sub-registration
> district: Kennington Second.
> William LOW, 1 year old , in home of James LOW (shoe maker) .
>
> 1851 census. Civil parish: Shoreditch-Ecclesiastical parish: St
> John-County/Island: Middlesex; Registration district:
> Shoreditch-Sub-registration district: Hoxton Old Town-ED, institution,
> or vessel: 8
> William LOW, 11, born Shoreditch, Middlesex, England, son in home of
> James LOW (shoe maker)
>
> 1871 census. London, Bethnal Green.
> household of William LOE, 31, born Surrey, England, shoe maker.
>
> 1881 census. Surrey, England. Civil Parish: Croyden, Town or village:
> Croydon; Urban Sanitary District: Croydon
> household of William Loe, 41, born Stockwell, Surrey, England, shoemaker
>
> 1891 census. Northamptonshire-Civil Parish: St Sepulchres;
> William LOE, Head, male 51, Shoemaker, born Stockwell, Surrey
>
> 1901 census. Northamptonshire , St Sepulchre (Civil) Parish.
> William Loe, male 61, Shoemaker, Stitchman, Hand sewn, Worker
> ("Employer, Worker or Own account"), Working at home, Born: Stockwell.
>
> For those familiar with the regions ...does this look the same man?
> There are obvious discrepancies. Can they be accounted for?
>
> Thanks for any insight or guidance
> Cynthia
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 




More information about the APGPublicList mailing list